• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Students & Alumnae
    • Undergraduate Thesis
    • Faculty of Business and Economics
    • Management
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Students & Alumnae
    • Undergraduate Thesis
    • Faculty of Business and Economics
    • Management
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Test Of Capital Asset Pricing Model; Jakarta Stock Exchange, Year 2005

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    02311279 Rifqi Hanif Muhammad.pdf (12.27Mb)
    Date
    2006
    Author
    Rifqi Hanif Muhammad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    There were so many discussions about CAPM, especially about the effectiveness of this model to predict expected return. This research explored the applicability of using CAPM to predict expected return in public firm in Indonesia. In short, the return of investment was examined to investigate the effectiveness of CAPM in predicting the expected return. This research was hypothesis-testing research. There was a hypothesis tested in this research. The hypothesis stated that expected return predicted using CAPM have no significant difference to actual return. The data collected were secondary data obtained from literature and documentation. The population used in this research were all companies' share listed in Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSX) traded in the year 2005, and the sample taken were LQ 45 companies listed at the Jakarta Stock Exchange in the period of 2005 using purposive sampling. The findings of this research indicated that it is not applicable to use CAPM to predict the expected return in public finn in Indonesia. CAPM which is predicted using the regression analysis to find beta could not predict the expected return accurately among stocks. The t-test also shows that the use of CAPM in public firm in Indonesia is not effective. The value of predicted value of return (expected rate of return) both in weekly development and in stocks comparison show any bias from the actual rate of return. The t-test result shows that there is significant difference of actual return and expected return predicted using the CAPM. CAPM can not p.-cdict the rate of the return effectively using the actual return, risk free rate return, and market return. All of these data can not accurately give infonnation to the result of expected return obtained using the CAPM.
    URI
    https://dspace.uii.ac.id/123456789/27245
    Collections
    • Management [3274]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV