| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to find anyone convicted of corruption can be sentenced to an additional form of revocation of certain political rights as well as to analyze how the justification of criminal law and human rights against the verdict in a corruption case that impose additional penalty of revocation of certain political rights. The study was based on research with a normative juridical approach to legislation (statute approach) and approaches the case (case approach). The source of the data is based on two approaches are secondary data sources or literature data and documents in the form of legal materials. The materials primary law consists of legislation, official records or minutes in the legislation and the decisions of the judges of secondary legal materials in the form of interviews with experts in the field of criminal law and human rights. In accordance with the data source as described above, in this study data collection through interviews combined with data collection using sampling techniques aiming (purposive Non Random Sampling). Analysis of the data on normative legal research is descriptive qualitative, in which the material or materials such law to be further studied and analyzed in its content, so that can know the level of synchronization, eligibility norms, as well as the submission of ideas that the new norm It can be concluded, first that the defendant criteria that an additional penalty may be imposed revocation of the rights of the rights that defendants have a political position or a position in which the convicted person guilty of corruption by abusing the authority or power that he has. Second, the revocation of the right to vote and be elected in public office of criminal law perspective allowed as long as the load restrictions of validity and revocation is declared when to begin the exercise of such rights. The imposition of additional criminal disenfranchisement and be elected in public office is not contrary to human rights (HAM) insofar as they meet the preconditions have been determined. Based on research, it can be concluded the imposition verdict additional penalty of revocation of the right to vote and be elected into public office to convict corruption is an effort that is wary for corruption convicts as well as preventive measures of corruption, ultimately the author recommends to order judges to be consistent in imposing additional criminal revocation lists when political rights as well as the entry into force and the deadline for entry into force. Keywords: Revocation Political Rights, Convicted of Corruption, Criminal Law & Human Rights | en_US |
