| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to determine the normative framework of The Urgency Of
Alternative Threats And Probation In The Application Of The Death Penalty,
because the existence of this concept raises debates and problems. Both the
existence of which is doubtful conceptually and the effectiveness of the
application. The formulation of the problem in this research is What the urgence
of alternative threats and probation in the application of the death penalty? And
What is the ideal concept of implementing death penalty from the perspective of
sentencing theories and human rights? This type of research is normative with an
instrumental approach method which is then supported by empirical data. The
urgency of Alternative Threats And Probation In The Application Of The Death
Penalty is not fundamentally philosophical, juridical and sociological. Second,
the lack of clarity of conception, so that it will potentially cause problems in its
enforcement. Third, a review of norms must be carried out by considering the
aspects of progressive legal reform. Fourth, the state is obliged to make
progressive and special policies for cases of serious crimes other than the
application of the death penalty. | en_US |
