Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorIntan Pradita, S.S., M. Hum
dc.contributor.authorNURULIA ARIYANTI
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T06:26:10Z
dc.date.available2022-08-24T06:26:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/38833
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to describe the perceptions of English lecturers in using written corrective feedback during thesis supervision in Indonesian context. Drawing on interviews with two lecturers who experienced using written corrective feedback in thesis supervision. The data were collected through face- to-face interview and online interview using WhatsApp. The data was analyzed by using thematic analysis. The research found that both English lecturers have the different and similar perceptions of providing written corrective feedback. Although both lecturers show the differences of providing the types of written corrective feedback in the students’ thesis writing, both lecturers positively show the similarities during providing written feedback. The potential causes of this positive perception of lecturers when providing feedback is due to the cognitive engagement as perceived by the English lecturers. Both lecturers agree that providing written corrective feedback is necessary and important to the students during the process of thesis supervision.en_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Islam Indonesiaen_US
dc.subjectLecturers’ perceptionsen_US
dc.subjectwritten corrective feedbacken_US
dc.subjectonline thesis supervisionen_US
dc.titleEnglish Lecturers’ Perceptions On The Use Of Written Corrective Feedback In Online Thesis Supervisionen_US
dc.Identifier.NIM18322054


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record