• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 9th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 9th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluasi saluran drainase pada Jalan Lingkar Selatan sta 3+350 s/d sta 4+850, Cilegon

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    36_Evaluasi saluran drainase pada jalan lingkar selatan.pdf (417.6Kb)
    Date
    2025-07-31
    Author
    Abdullah, Mus’ab
    Astuti, Sri Amini Yuni
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The Cilegon City South Ring Road is a strategic and important road because it serves as a route to tourist areas and industrial areas such as factories and logistics flows to Merak Port. One problem on this road is the occurrence of waterlogging on the road surface. This can be caused by changes in land use from vacant land to residential areas or other buildings, which impacts the inability of the existing drainage system. Therefore, an evaluation of the drainage channel capacity on this road is necessary. Evaluation of the adequacy of drainage capacity is analyzed by comparing the existing channel capacity discharge with the planned flood discharge. The existing channel capacity discharge is calculated using hydraulic analysis with flow velocity calculations using the Manning formula, while the planned discharge uses the rational method with rainfall intensity calculated at return periods of 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years, and 50 years using the Mononobe formula. The drainage channel is considered safe if the channel capacity discharge is greater than or equal to the planned flood discharge, while the channel is categorized as overflowing or unsafe if the planned flood discharge is greater than the existing channel discharge. The results of this study found an overflow in the existing channel with a 50-year return period. The existing channel is not capable of accommodating the planned flood discharge, so it needs to be redesigned by enlarging the channel dimensions.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57377
    Collections
    • 9th CE REFORM [51]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV