• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 9th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 9th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Evaluasi perilaku kolom beton bertulang akibat perkuatan (studi kasus concrete jacketing dengan baja tulangan dan GFRP rebar)

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    2_Perbandingan perilaku perkuatan concrete jacketing kolom dengan material baja tulangan dan GFRP rebar.pdf (1.385Mb)
    Date
    2025-07-31
    Author
    Rohman, Wahyu Nur
    Marasabessy, Muhammad Irfan
    Hidayat, Muhammad Zakki Rizal
    Hanafi, Nufrizal Faried
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Concrete jacketing is a strengthening technique involving the addition of new reinforcement and concrete to existing structural elements with optimized dimensions. In recent developments, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) bars have emerged as a promising alternative to conventional steel reinforcement, offering nearly three times higher tensile strength. This study numerically investigates the behavior of reinforced concrete columns under three conditions: unstrengthened (Specimen A), strengthened with steel-reinforced jacketing (Specimen B), and strengthened with GFRP-reinforced jacketing (Specimen C). The analysis focuses on load capacity, stress distribution, material performance, and plasticity levels. The unstrengthened column measures 70×70 cm with 20D25 BJTD 40 reinforcement, while the jacketed columns measure 80×80 cm with an additional 20 bars of 10 mm diameter. All column models have a height of 4 m and are idealized using fiber element modeling with 20 fiber hinges. The maximum load capacities were 313.5 kN (A), 395.45 kN (B), and 367.23 kN (C). The highest concrete compressive stress was observed in Specimen A (12.96 MPa), while the maximum initial tensile stress in steel reinforcement occurred in Specimen B (505.1 MPa). The peak tensile stress in the jacketing reinforcement was also in Specimen B (514.33 MPa). All models exhibited concrete cracking in tension zones and rebar yielding, classified under Immediate Occupancy (IO) performance level. Plasticity levels of tensile reinforcement predominantly ranged from B to E, while compressive concrete zones showed B–C behavior in Specimen A and A–B in Specimens B and C.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/57348
    Collections
    • 9th CE REFORM [51]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV