• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 6th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • Lecturers And Researchers
    • Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning
    • Department of Civil Engineering
    • Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum
    • 6th CE REFORM
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Analisis perencanaan fondasi tiang pancang dengan variasi diameter pada tower Pegadaian

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Proceeding The 6th CeReform Final-205-213.pdf (501.5Kb)
    Date
    2024-02-07
    Author
    Rochmatullah, Hamim Farchan Noor
    Amalina, Anisa Nur
    Marzuko, Akhmad
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The foundation serves as the crucial support structure for a building, bearing the weight of the structure above. In the construction of the Pegadaian Tower Building on Jalan Kramat Raya, Central Jakarta, drilled pile foundations with a 1.0 m diameter and a length of 39 m were utilized. This study aims to reassess the design of these drilled pile foundations by considering variations in diameter to investigate their impact on loadbearing capacity and settlement. Four diameter variations, namely 0.7 m, 0.8 m, 0.9 m, and 1.0 m, were evaluated, all with a consistent pile length of 39 m. Data from the Detail Engineering Design (DED), Standard Penetration Test (SPT), and existing foundation information were employed for analysis. Structural analysis was conducted using SAP2000 version 14. The support capacity of the drilled pile foundations was assessed using the Skempton and Tomlinson methods, while the Meyerhoff and Tomlinson methods were applied for pile foundations. Reduction calculations for single piles were performed using the Poulus and Davis method, and for pile groups, the Vesic and 2:1 Spread methods were utilized. The analysis identified the 1.0 m diameter option, calculated using the Tomlinson method, as the most suitable. This configuration consisted of five piles within a group, providing a total support capacity (Qg) of 12554.91 kN, exceeding the axial load (P) of 11436.13 kN. Settlement analysis revealed a decrease of 25.57 cm, which, upon recalculating the pile length to 42 m and distance using the formula 2.5D + 0.02L, resulted in a settlement of 13.89 cm—below the permissible limit of 15.17 cm. Thus, the foundation's capacity and settlement meet safety requirements, confirming its viability for use.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/56302
    Collections
    • 6th CE REFORM [41]

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV