| dc.description.abstract | This thesis explores the topic of “The Settlement Analysis of Civil Lawsuit Cases
of Tort in Surakarta District Court and Surakarta Religious Court” through a
comprehensive literature review and original research. The objectives of this study
are to know the judge's consideration in determining and deciding the trial of a
civil case for an unlawful act (Tort) at the Surakarta District Court and the
Surakarta Religious Court. The methodology used to achieve these objectives of
this research is a qualitative method with an empirical juridical approach, namely
an approach in the form of an understanding of the role of the object of research
activities with the implementation of laws governing legal aid. From the data that
has been obtained, then carry out an analysis to be able to answer the questions in
the focus research that are about how tort cases occur, how is the settlement, and
how the judge’s consideration in deciding the trial of tort cases. The results of the
study indicate that the majority of tort civil cases that occurred in the Surakarta
District Court and the Surakarta Religious Court had the same pattern, namely
xxii
between creditors and debtors that began with wanprestasi committed by one of
the parties. Meanwhile, there are significant differences in the type and amount of
tort registered to each court, as well as the understanding of court officials
regarding tort. As for the settlement in court, both District Court judges and
Religious Court judges are based on the same procedural law. | en_US |
