| dc.description.abstract | Indonesia is a pluralistic and religious country mostly populated by
Muslims. However, it does not mean that Indonesia is an Islamic country. It cannot
be denied that the greater number of followers of Islamic teachings in a country has
led to the establishment of more diverse religious organizations, as occurred in
Indonesia. Many Islamic organizations have emerged in Indonesia with diverse
ideologies and methodologies of Islamic law istinbāṭ. This can be seen from many
issues between mainstream Islamic organizations and non-mainstream Islamic
organizations in terms of the concept of formal implementation of Islamic sharia in
the nation and state in Indonesia in which in this case Nahdlatul Ulama is as a
mainstream Islamic organization and Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia is as a non-
mainstream Islamic organization.
This is a library qualitative research with an aim to analyze the methodology
of the legal istinbāṭ of Nahdlatul Ulama and Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia, factors
behind the concept of the legal istinbāṭ method of the two organizations. This study
used a normative and historical-sociological approach with descriptive analysis
method.
The result of this research showed a number of legal istinbāṭ methods used
in stages by Nahdlatul Ulama in Bahtsul Masail, including Qauli, ilhaqy, and
manhajy. However, in the last decade, the istinbāṭ istiṣlāḥi method has also been
used. Meanwhile, the legal istinbāṭ method used by Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia is
the bayani method. The concepts in the legal istinbāṭ method of Nahdlatul Ulama
and Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia have been motivated by two factors: internal
factors, namely educational background of the founders or prominent figures of
Nahdlatul Ulama and Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia and external factors motivated
by the socio-historical condition of the establishment of Nahdlatul Ulama and
Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia. | en_US |
