Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUswah, Ulil
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-22T02:51:56Z
dc.date.available2018-09-22T02:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-27
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/10790
dc.description.abstractProtection for consumer of sharia financial services is defined as any efforts to guarantee the legal certainty that gives protection to consumers in sharia business. In sharia financial services, the two interrelated, interdependent parties are the businessmen and the consumers as well as a possibly related third party. An interaction may cause a dispute begun by a breach of rights and obligations among the parties. Therefore, the government issued Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection (UUPK) particularly Article 1 Paragraph (1) and Article 45, Regulation of the Financial Services Authority (POJK) No. 1/POJK.07/2013 particularly Article 1 Paragraph (3) and Article 39, and Law on Religious Judiciary particularly Article 49 of Law No. 3 Year 2006. However, some issues related to consumer protection against sharia financial services continue to emerge. One of the causes is ineffective implementation of the laws due to ambiguities in some of the articles of the aforementioned laws, such as the form of consumer protection against sharia financial services in a religious judiciary. Based on the background, the researcher focused on “Consumer Protection against Sharia Financial Services in the Religious Judiciary after Law No. 3 of 2006 on Amendment of Law No. 7 of 1989 on Religious Judiciary. The research question was how is the implementation of the “simple, fast, cheap” principles in the process of consumer protection dispute settlement in the religious court. The methodology of this study was the normative juridical research using the legislative approach by studying UUPK, POJK, and UUPA as well as analyzing several court decisions. This study concluded that the religious court has protected the consumers, businessmen, as well as related third party in the form of dispute settlement. The form of protection by the religious court is direct and indirect protections. The principles used by the religious court in settling the dispute are simple, fast, and cheap. The simple principles was implemented but was not optimum due to ignorance, incomprehension, and unconsciousness of the parties in the religious court. However, the fast principles have not been properly implemented. Then the cheap principles was implemented, even in religious court there are ‘prodeo’ for poor citizensen_US
dc.publisherUniversitas Islam Indonesiaen_US
dc.subjectConsumer Protectionen_US
dc.subjectSharia Financial Servicesen_US
dc.subjectResearch Subject Categories::LAW/JURISPRUDENCEen_US
dc.titlePerlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Jasa Keuangan Syariah Pada Peradilan Agama (Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Amandemen Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama)en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record