Post-reform, the regulations of the village become into one package with the Law of Regional Governance. Which is regulated in the Law No. 22 of 1999 on Regional Governance and Law No. 32 Year 2004 on Regional Governance, Law No. 23 Year 2014 on Regional Governance, and the last, Village regulated itself with the Law No. 6 Year 2014 concerning the village. The relationship between Local Governance and village becomes not erratic and ran away from the essence. In addition, to carry out the rest of authority of the Local Governance although not heirarkis but also formalistic, the existence of the village as a unit of law community that possess a genuine autonomy based on the rightful origins aren’t fully recognized. As a unity of state, Indonesia recognizes and respects the existence of the Village and also the customary Village, which is called as "The Unity of Community Customary Law", as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, this research focuses on two formulation of the problem. First, how is the relationship between Local Governance and Village post-reform, before and after the enactment of Law No. 6 Year 2014? Second, is it relevant with the design of relationship between Local Governance and Village of Law No. 6 Year 2014, when we viewed from the concept of Unity State of Republic Indonesia (NKRI)? This research is a normative law research, by analyzing the regulation of legislation in force which related to Local Governance and Village Post-reform. This study used two approaches, namely are the juridical-normative (statue approach), and historical approach (historical approach).From this research results that,there are some conclusions: First, the setting in the village of Law No. 22 Year 1999 and Law 32 Year 2004 didn't change significantly. So, such arrangements have implications to the Village Governance,include authority, organization system of government, and Village finance and asset management and natural resources of the Village. Second, the relationship between Local Governance and Village especially in Law 22 Year 1999 and Law 32 Year 2004, is increasingly unclear and are likely partial. Basically the Village and the area is a sub system of governance that has its own government. Precisely opposite stipulated in the one Law, so that the essence of the Village as a unit of community becomes blurred. Third, the design of Law No. 6 Year 2014 about Village is not in conflict with the concept of Unity State Of Republic Indonesia. Precisely, the existence of Village is strengthening the system of a unity state with honor and acknowledge its existence. The existence of the Village and the customary Village as a community unit, and also the autonomy's of village has a constitutional basis. The Village's position is not as array of structure lowest governance, but a sub-system of the Government. Because the village according to this Law is the incorporation of two important elements namely are the self-governing local community and local self-goverment based on the principle of recognition and subsidiarity. 
Keywords: Relationship, Local Governance and Village, Autonomy